The correct identification of requirements is a crucial step for the implementation of a satisfactory software system. In the validation of \edit{requirements with scenarios}, a straightforward communication is central to obtain a good participation from stakeholders. Technical specifications are translated into scenarios to make them concrete and easy to understand for non-technical users, and contextual details are added to encourage user engagement. However, additional contextual details (Ahab's Legs) could generate a negative impact on the requirements' validation by leading to proliferating comments that are not pertinent to session objective. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Ahab's Leg to scenario-based requirement validation sessions. We conducted a controlled experiment with human participants and measured the pertinence of the comments formulated by participants when discussing the requirements. The results of our experiment suggest that the potentially negative impact of Ahab's Leg can be effectively controlled by the analyst.

Ahab’s legs in scenario-based requirements validation: An experiment to study communication mistakes

Ceccato, Mariano;Marchetto, Alessandro;Susi, Angelo
2015-01-01

Abstract

The correct identification of requirements is a crucial step for the implementation of a satisfactory software system. In the validation of \edit{requirements with scenarios}, a straightforward communication is central to obtain a good participation from stakeholders. Technical specifications are translated into scenarios to make them concrete and easy to understand for non-technical users, and contextual details are added to encourage user engagement. However, additional contextual details (Ahab's Legs) could generate a negative impact on the requirements' validation by leading to proliferating comments that are not pertinent to session objective. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Ahab's Leg to scenario-based requirement validation sessions. We conducted a controlled experiment with human participants and measured the pertinence of the comments formulated by participants when discussing the requirements. The results of our experiment suggest that the potentially negative impact of Ahab's Leg can be effectively controlled by the analyst.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0164121215001648-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 636.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
636.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11582/300451
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact