Vital signs as a source of racial bias

Background racial bias has been shown to be present in clinical data, affecting patients unfairly based on their race, ethnicity and socio-economic status. This problem has the potential to be significantly exacerbated in the light of Artificial Intelligence-aided clinical decision making. We sought to investigate whether bias can be introduced from sources that are considered neutral with respect to ethnicity and race and consequently routinely used in modelling, specifically vital signs. Methods to perform our analysis, we extracted vital signs from 49,610 admissions from a cohort of adult patients during the first 24 hours after the admission to the Intensive Care Units (ICU), derived from multi-centre eICU-CRD database and single-centre MIMIC-III database, spanning over 208 hospitals and 335 ICUs. Using heart rate, SaO2, respiratory rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, we develop machine learning models based on Logistic Regression and eXtreme Gradient Boosting and investigate their performance in predicting patients’ self-reported race. To balance the dataset between the three ethno-races considered in our study, we use a matching cohort based on age, gender, and admission diagnosis. Findings standard machine learning models, derived solely on six vital signs can be used to predict patients’ self-reported race with AUC of 75%. Our findings hold under diverse patient populations, derived from multiple hospitals and intensive care units. We also show that oxygen saturation is a highly predictive variable, even when measured through methods other than pulse oximetry, namely arterial blood gas analysis, suggesting that addressing bias in routinely collected clinical variables will be challenging. Interpretation our finding that machine learning models can predict self-reported race using solely vital signs creates a significant risk in clinical decision making, further exacerbating racial inequalities, with highly challenging mitigation measures.