In this paper we describe our participation at the EVALITA 2009 Constituency Parsing Task. We used the Berkeley Parser, obtaining the best F1, that is 78.73. This result corresponds to an increment of 15.85% with respect to the best result obtained at EVALITA 2007 by the Bikel`s parser (F1 = 67.96). A further important advantage of the Berkeley parser is that it does not require any language adaptation in addition to the need of retraining it on the new treebank. For comparison, we also report the results obtained by the Bikel`s parser on the 2009 treebank.

The Berkeley Parser at the EVALITA 2009 Constituency Parsing Task

Lavelli, Alberto;
2009

Abstract

In this paper we describe our participation at the EVALITA 2009 Constituency Parsing Task. We used the Berkeley Parser, obtaining the best F1, that is 78.73. This result corresponds to an increment of 15.85% with respect to the best result obtained at EVALITA 2007 by the Bikel`s parser (F1 = 67.96). A further important advantage of the Berkeley parser is that it does not require any language adaptation in addition to the need of retraining it on the new treebank. For comparison, we also report the results obtained by the Bikel`s parser on the 2009 treebank.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11582/5370
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact