This study introduced a new method for the quantflcation of rhe synchronization (S) and the causal verse of activation (S12) in couples of atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation (AF). The synchronizarion indexes S and SI2 relied on the measure of the propagation delays between coupled activation times in two atrial signals and on the characterization of thkir dispersion by Shannon-Entropy (SE). S and SI2 were validated both on simulated activation time series and endocavitary signals in patients. In simulation, S and SI2 were equal to 1 for propagation of one single wavefront in a fully excitable tissue, while they decreased for reenfries in partially excitable tissue (S = 0.70 ± 0.05, SI2 = 0.66 ± 0.05 ) and multiple wavelet propagation (S = 0.46 ± 0.06, SI2 = 0.39 ± 0.08). In patients S, was equal to 1 during atrial flutter (AFI) and decreased with increasing complexity of AF (AF1: S = 0.76 f 0.05; AFZ: S = 0.56 ± 0.06; AF3: S = 0.39 ± 0.08). Moreover SI2 evidenced the preservation of a correct activation sequence during AFL and AFI (SI2 = S) and its loss during AF2 (SI2 = 0.41 ± 0.12 -= S) and AF3 (SI2 = 0.26 ± 0.03 < S). As indirect markers of the electrophysiological properties of atrial tissue, indexes S and SI2 may provide a new insight in understunding the mechanisms initiating and maintaining AF and support new clinical treatments for its interruption.
Quantitative assessment of synchronization during atrial fibrillation by shannon entropy characterization of propagation delays
Masè, Michela;Ravelli, Flavia;Faes, Luca;Nollo, Giandomenico
2004-01-01
Abstract
This study introduced a new method for the quantflcation of rhe synchronization (S) and the causal verse of activation (S12) in couples of atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation (AF). The synchronizarion indexes S and SI2 relied on the measure of the propagation delays between coupled activation times in two atrial signals and on the characterization of thkir dispersion by Shannon-Entropy (SE). S and SI2 were validated both on simulated activation time series and endocavitary signals in patients. In simulation, S and SI2 were equal to 1 for propagation of one single wavefront in a fully excitable tissue, while they decreased for reenfries in partially excitable tissue (S = 0.70 ± 0.05, SI2 = 0.66 ± 0.05 ) and multiple wavelet propagation (S = 0.46 ± 0.06, SI2 = 0.39 ± 0.08). In patients S, was equal to 1 during atrial flutter (AFI) and decreased with increasing complexity of AF (AF1: S = 0.76 f 0.05; AFZ: S = 0.56 ± 0.06; AF3: S = 0.39 ± 0.08). Moreover SI2 evidenced the preservation of a correct activation sequence during AFL and AFI (SI2 = S) and its loss during AF2 (SI2 = 0.41 ± 0.12 -= S) and AF3 (SI2 = 0.26 ± 0.03 < S). As indirect markers of the electrophysiological properties of atrial tissue, indexes S and SI2 may provide a new insight in understunding the mechanisms initiating and maintaining AF and support new clinical treatments for its interruption.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.